Opinion

When will we truly start to respect nature and biodiversity?

By: Julian Hyde

I refer to the recent incident in which a barge-grounding destroyed an area of coral reef on the island of Mabul in Sabah. This is a sad incident that perhaps reflects the regrettably low level of awareness of biodiversity in the country and why it is important to society. According to reports, the barge operator was told of the damage he would cause by mooring the barge in a particular location, but chose to go ahead anyway. Many might think that an incident such as this should be treated with leniency – after all, it was an accident; and they may be right.

But what if an activity or project is proposed that will have known negative impacts on marine ecosystems? Where does the balance tip to a position that supports biodiversity rather than accepting further damage as “a necessary consequence of development”? When will we truly start to respect nature and biodiversity and put a true value on the ecosystem services it provides?

1. Healthy coral reefs off the coasts of Sabah.jpg

Healthy coral reefs off the coasts of Sabah

Reef Check Malaysia recently participated in a meeting of experts to develop an improved governance system for Malaysia’s coastal biodiversity. The group, led by the Academy of Science Malaysia, is working to identify important areas of biodiversity that should be targeted for conservation. The coastal area south of Kuantan was identified as one such area, and experts agreed that efforts should be made to protect and conserve it.

At the same time, Reef Check Malaysia is working with scientists to map marine resources along the East coast of Peninsular Malaysia. The same area south of Kuantan has been identified as having important coral reefs, reefs that thrive in the turbid coastal waters common in the area. They are an important biological asset: they are an essential link in connectivity between ecosystems; and they provide habitat to a wide range of marine organisms. The area is a known fishing ground for local communities, whose food source and livelihoods depend on the reefs.

Conducting reef surveys along the coasts of Tioman Island

Conducting reef surveys along the coasts of Tioman Island

Given the apparent low level of awareness of the importance of our natural resources, how can we protect these coastal ecosystems from damage caused by the so-called Blue Economy – marine tourism, extractive activities, shipping, and so on? Such activities can cause severe damage to marine ecosystems – by releasing silt, or by causing physical damage, etc. This can kill the coral reefs and other marine ecosystems that local communities rely on for food and livelihoods. While acknowledging there is also an economic dimension to such activities, we urge the government to consider carefully the impact on biodiversity, livelihoods and food security that such projects can have. Careful site selection might avoid unnecessary damage to marine ecosystems.

We can avoid another “Mabul” by selecting project sites carefully, taking into account both ecosystems and the livelihoods of local communities.

###

Julian Hyde is the General Manager of Reef Check Malaysia (RCM). Registered in Malaysia in 2007 as an NGO, RCM's early work was focused on coral reef monitoring and island based educational programs.  Today, RCM monitors over 200 coral reefs annually around the country and is actively involved in reef management and conservation efforts. 

Reef Check Malaysia's View on Redang Airport Plan

By: Julian Hyde

Reef Check Malaysia is dismayed to learn of more plans for airport extensions on islands off the East coast of Peninsular Malaysia, this time on Redang Island.

IMAG0215 (1).jpg

In 2019, it was Tioman Island that was the hot topic, with a report in The Sun on October 7 quoting the project proponents that the construction of a new airport there was all but confirmed. The airport would be built on reclaimed land – which would destroy coral reefs directly within the project area and very likely affect coral reefs around the island due to the impacts of siltation disturbed during construction. The airport would directly affect 10% of the island’s western coastline – a 2 km long runway on a 20 km long coastline. Indirectly it would affect a much larger area due to disturbance along the flight path at low altitude. It would also effectively close down tourism operations in two of the island’s seven villages. The plan was that the airport would bring in hundreds of thousands of additional visitors every year…this to an island with insufficient water supply, insufficient electricity, an incinerator that can’t handle the current volume of trash generated, no integrated sewage treatment, very limited road network…

And now we hear plans for an international airport on Redang island – again, an extension of an existing airport.

The arguments against building a larger airport at Redang are very similar to the objections raised on Tioman:

  •  Biodiversity: During construction of any marine infrastructure, there will be physical destruction of marine ecosystems in the immediate vicinity of the project site. When coral reefs are damaged by impacts of this magnitude, the biodiversity of the whole reef system declines, fish populations dwindle and a thriving reef community is replaced with a new ecosystem with much lower productivity. Reefs in this degraded condition are also not attractive to tourists.

  • Infrastructure: Electricity supply, water supply, sewage treatment, waste management, road infrastructure – all are significant constraints to further development on the islands and for growth in tourism numbers.

  • Economics of tourism: Once tourism has grown to a certain size, economic growth usually benefits outsiders as resort development opportunities are beyond the financial capacity of local residents, and large companies are attracted to the destination. Such resort development brings little benefit in terms of jobs to local communities, as large resorts rely on outside workers. Further, large resorts typically offer a comprehensive package of meals and activities, taking away business from local communities who no longer have access to the customers in resorts.

  • Tourism trends: Post-coronavirus, tourism industry experts are predicting that mass tourism may never return. The post-coronavirus tourism industry will look very different, with smaller groups looking for nature-based, authentic local experiences in locations where safety and health can be assured. Cities will suffer; islands could benefit – but only if they are able to provide the high quality, small scale tourism experience that future travellers will be seeking.

Malaysia is a signatory of international agreements that commit the nation to protecting its biodiversity. The Malaysian National Policy on Biological Diversity sets out targets to protect biodiversity. Climate change impacts are becoming increasingly real in Malaysia…why are we even considering such projects that benefit few but have the potential to harm many?

We hope the government will carefully review these projects to ensure all the facts are taken into account before decisions are confirmed. Meanwhile, we urge everyone to make their views known by completing the social impact survey that PLAN  Malaysia set up: https://forms.gle/p52KeRXdqMCgu3ro6